Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:25:25PM -0700, Mike Rosset wrote: >> (modify-phases %standard-phases >> + (add-after 'unpack 'declare-for-int >> + (lambda _ >> + ;; Declare the for loop i incrementer. >> + (substitute* "dbus/sigsegv.c" >> + (("for\\(i = 0") "for(int i = 0")) >> + #t)) > > Any chance of an upstream bug number or something for this? It seems > like the type of thing that might be put into a snippet. > That's a good idea, in retrospect Andreas did not report having this issue. Let me do a second in series that removes this hunk. The second hunk resolves the undefined reference to symbol '__gxx_personality_v0@@CXXABI_1.3 I think that change is a safe one.. Then I can do some follow up the for loop initialization errors. Hopefully it's just not me effected by that error. I'll see about making this a snippet as well. Mike