Jakub Kądziołka <k...@kadziolka.net> writes: > Unfortunately, LLVM is a reverse-dep to the entire mesa mess, so this > approach would require a trip through staging (unless we create a > separate llvm-for-mesa package - would that be reasonable?).
Sounds good to me. On a mostly unrelated note, I wonder if we should make 'llvm-for-mesa' a permanent thing in the long term, and build only the subset of LLVM that Mesa uses.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
