Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis: > But now I’m curious and I look at the documentation for “remove” from > (rnrs lists): > > -- Scheme Procedure: remp proc list > -- Scheme Procedure: remove obj list > -- Scheme Procedure: remv obj list > -- Scheme Procedure: remq obj list > ‘remove’, ‘remv’, and ‘remq’ are identical to the ‘delete’, ‘delv’, > and ‘delq’ procedures provided by Guile’s core library, (*note List > Modification::). ‘remp’ is identical to the alternate ‘remove’ > procedure provided by SRFI-1; *Note SRFI-1 Deleting::. > > Oh.
Bah, R6 is terrible in that respect. > So here are my questions: > > * can we prefer (srfi srfi-1) over (rnrs lists) in the suggestions for > “remove”? I don’t think we should do that. However, listing all the possibilities, as Danny suggests, would be nice. > * can we avoid this by extending modify-services to support “delete” > much like modify-phases, and suggesting to use that instead of > “remove”? That’s the better option! Ludo’.
