Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > Hi! > > Mathieu Othacehe <m.othac...@gmail.com> skribis: > >>> Yup, turned out patching GCC was too difficult. I'm experimenting a >>> filter over inputs passed to set-path-environment-variable in set-paths. >> >> This is also quite tricky, because the "libc" input passed to set-paths >> must not be removed from C_INCLUDE_PATH in (gnu packages commencement) >> for mes packages. > > Yeah, fiddling with ‘set-paths’ sounds like opening a can of worms. > >> So, maybe the best option is to patch QEMU directly, as proposed in >> the attached patch. WDYT? > > I’m all in favor of that for now. It’s likely that QEMU is the only > package having problems, as Marius noted (the GHC error sounds like it > could be something different), so I’d say go for the package-specific > solution for now.
Indeed, I will push Mathieus commit shortly. clang-runtime requires a similar fix for CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH. No idea what's up with GHC@8.4 yet, but unsurprisingly removing libc from the include paths does not make a difference.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
