On Fri 20 Dec 2019 22:08, Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> writes:
> zimoun <[email protected]> writes: > >> - I propose the name "guix shell" > > This is not a bad idea, especially considering that “guix environment” > was meant to get shebang support, so that you could use it as the > interpreter in a script that handles the environment configuration. > > It is also shorter. I like this idea. It would also allow us to deprecate "guix environment" over a period of a year or so, and we can probably show an equivalent "guix shell" invocation in the deprecation message. Andy
