Hello Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.cour...@inria.fr> writes:
>>
>>> ‘guix pack -f docker’ currently creates an image without
>>> /etc/{passwd,group,shadow}.
>>>
>>> It’s OK most of the time, but again it looks like a gratuitous annoyance
>>> for those cases where having them around matters (that’s also the reason
>>> why guix-daemon creates them.)
>>
>> Would that include the files required for PAM authentication to work
>> correctly? I remember struggling with this use case: using the Docker
>> image with CQFD wrapper, which must be able to create a user and
>> sudo'ing (or 'su') to it in the docker container.
>
> I wonder if at this point it wouldn’t be better to build a whole system
> container. Isn’t that outside the scope of “guix pack” and rather a
> task for “guix system”?
Probably! But then one has to wonder if adding some base files to `guix
pack' is not one of those slippery slopes where users come back
expecting more stuff to be there?
What use case(s) exactly depend on the presence of the
/etc/{passwd,group,shadow} files?
Maxim
