Robert Vollmert <r...@vllmrt.net> skribis: > I tried to use a function in a gexp along the lines of > > (define* (f x) …) > > #~(begin > (#$f x) > …) > > This resulted in the following error: > > ERROR: In procedure primitive-load: > In procedure scm_lreadr: > /gnu/store/wcw0fii855axkiqfz05283rwl7nlrb3i-puzzledb-blogs-job-builder:1:254: > Unknown # object: #\< > > where the referenced builder file contains > > … (let ((backend (#<procedure read-secret (file)> "tools.token"))) … > > It seems to me that whatever code writes the builder file should already > complain at the point > where it substitutes #<procedure read-secret (file)> — is that possible?
I think ‘gexp->sexp’ should simply error out whenever an object that lacks a read syntax (like a procedure) is inserted in a gexp. Ludo’.
