Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes:
>> This allows you to match “eof-object” and '() directly. Whenever I see >> “string-null?” I think it might be better to “match” on the empty list >> directly. > > string-null? and an empty list are not the same, unless I'm missing something. Yes, sorry, I meant “null?”. Using “string-null?” is equivalent to matching the empty string, of course. >> But really, that’s up to you. I only feel strongly about avoiding “(if >> … (cond …))”. > > Due to the problem mentioned above, I stayed with "cond". Okay! Thanks. -- Ricardo
