Hah, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
No argument here! The patch referred to a keyword argument that does not exist, which is why I’m indeed suggesting more testing. Simplylooking at the compiler warnings would have raised a flag.
There were no warnings and the code itself runs fine (believe me, I've run it way too often already -_-') because this was written on top of #36132.
I guess I was optimistic about its speedy acceptance. Kind regards, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
