Hello,

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <[email protected]> skribis:

> How about changing ‘previous generations’ to ‘all generations’, and
> have it include the current generation at the top (now with # and
> date, maybe ‘(current)’ appended)?

Yes, I’m fine either way (I found that “previous generations” was clear
enough, but apparently it isn’t all that clear).

Thanks,
Ludo’.



Reply via email to