On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:04:18PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I agree we need more automation here. One way to do this would be > something like ‘make assert-binaries-available’, which checks for > substitute availability (it could be a prerequisite of ‘make dist’), > where we’d explicitly check for DEs on x86_64 and i686. That would be > an improvement, though it’d still be quite handcrafted. > > Ludo’.
This overlaps with the need for (eventually) a stable branch, I think. Regards, Florian
