On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 22:49 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > If it does after all contain objectionable files please point them > out so that we can remove them ASAP.
That was done earlier in the thread. It might also be interesting to try building with enable_widevine=true. In the context of the FSDG's "a free system distribution must not contain browsers that implement EME, the browser functionality designed to load DRM modules", I wonder if the browser would still be considered as "implementing" the "functionality ... to load DRM modules" from the FSF's viewpoint since it's only a build flag and the support for loading the module (even if not provided by Guix since it's non-free) seems otherwise intact.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
