Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> skribis: > Switch to a new user, or simply log in as 'root' if you've never "guix > pull"ed with it, then > > # guix pull -l > Backtrace: > 8 (apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 11508e0>) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 705:2 7 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle…>) > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 619:8 6 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 11d2140>))) > In guix/ui.scm: > 1644:12 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 829:9 4 (catch srfi-34 #<procedure 2e24be0 at guix/ui.scm:622:…> …) > 829:9 3 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e24c80 at guix/script…> …) > 829:9 2 (catch git-error #<procedure 2e24b40 at guix/scripts/p…> …) > 829:9 1 (catch system-error #<procedure 2e28c40 at guix/script…> …) > In unknown file: > 0 (raise #<condition &profile-not-found-error [profile: "…>) > > ERROR: In procedure raise: > Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #<condition &profile-not-found-error > [profile: "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/current-guix"] 2e1e8c0>
Fixed in c49b45c917eff17122aea5f7a57ae4cef02f1003. A missing import and the wrong ‘raise’ was being used. > I think we should make `guix pull -l' return a value that can be used > meaningfully in deployment scripts. For instance, a non-zero > exit code could mean this is a fresh user profile. Yep, that’s what was intended and what happens now. :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
