Hi! Pierre Neidhardt <m...@ambrevar.xyz> skribis:
> Thanks for looking into this, Ludo. > > At first glance, I'd say that this is not a compilation option but the way > strings are encoded by default. It seems that multibyte encoding is used all > over the place by a few compilers including SBCL (and CCL I think). > > One way I know around this (I'm by no mean a Common Lisp expert) is the > flexi-streams package for re-encoding. OK, we need to investigate. > More generally, shouldn't we make the reference scanner a bit smarter? In > particular, how does it handle non-ASCII references? Maybe it would not be > unreasonable to handle UTF-8 and UCS-4 for instance? Store file names are always ASCII so problems arise when they are stored as UTF-16 or UTF-32/UCS-4. Ludo’.
