Mark H Weaver writes:
> Hi Brett, > > Brett Gilio <bre...@posteo.net> writes: > >> Hi all, When I run ex: `guix package -s emacs` it is presenting this >> backtrace. It has been there for a few commits now. Does anybody have >> thoughts on it? >> >> Backtrace: >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 829:9 19 (catch _ _ #<procedure 7fb97a985498 at guix/ui.scm:615…> …) >> 829:9 18 (catch _ _ #<procedure 7fb97a9854b0 at guix/ui.scm:733…> …) >> In guix/scripts/package.scm: >> 914:8 17 (_) >> 760:9 16 (process-query _) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >> 829:9 15 (catch _ _ #<procedure 7fb97879a588 at guix/scripts/pa…> …) >> In guix/scripts/package.scm: >> 762:24 14 (_) >> 180:17 13 (find-packages-by-description _) >> In guix/discovery.scm: >> 155:3 12 (fold-module-public-variables _ _ _) >> In guix/combinators.scm: >> 45:26 11 (fold2 #<procedure 3b5ca00 at guix/discovery.scm:155:1…> …) >> 45:26 10 (fold2 #<procedure 3b4c580 at guix/discovery.scm:156:1…> …) >> In guix/discovery.scm: >> 158:33 9 (_ #<package emacs-csharp-mode@20181011.718 /home/bret…> …) >> In guix/scripts/package.scm: >> 183:38 8 (_ #<package emacs-csharp-mode@20181011.718 /home/bret…> …) >> In srfi/srfi-1.scm: >> 466:18 7 (fold #<procedure 34f94a0 at guix/ui.scm:1267:8 (metri…> …) >> In guix/ui.scm: >> 1270:13 6 (_ _ 4) >> 1146:23 5 (texi->plain-text _) >> In texinfo.scm: >> 1131:22 4 (parse _) >> 910:31 3 (loop #<input: string 22afa10> (*fragment*) #<procedur…> …) >> 753:31 2 (_ #<input: string 22afa10> _ #f #<procedure 7fb979065…> …) >> 492:18 1 (read-command-token #<input: string 22afa10>) >> 446:8 0 (read-command #<input: string 22afa10>) >> >> texinfo.scm:446:8: In procedure read-command: >> Throw to key `parser-error' with args `(#<input: string 22afa10> >> "Nonalphabetic @-command char: '" #\) "'")'. > > This appears to be due to an error in the texinfo markup within one of > the fields of the 'emacs-csharp-mode' package. > > I can't find an 'emacs-csharp-mode' package in the Guix source tree, so > I guess it lives in one of your private package directories. > > Mark You're right! My mistake! Thank you!