On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:36:49 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote:
> Hi Björn, > > > So we might get wrong look&feel here, because it is not adapted to > > GNOME 3.24. But there is no further development upstream anyway. If > > it doesn't look totally malformed, we can use it like that. My disk > > is a bit full, I can't do a vm-image with it currently. > > This is only going to get worse as we already have a later version of > GNOME in a branch, which is just waiting for the core-updates merge. > > If the package sees no further development we may want to drop it. > What do you think? I have no opinion about that package. I don't know it, I just saw that compile-error on core-updates and tried to fix it. With your question, I double checked that this is really dead and found in the bug tracker a link to a new, active fork: https://github.com/NicoHood/arc-theme They claim they are Arch/Debian/Ubuntu maintainers. I can try to prepare a patch for that. In the meantime, I try to test it. Do you know how to do that? Is installing the package enough, and then running gnome-tweak-tool? Or does it have to go into system-packages? Björn
pgpJDKLB5VT_R.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
