Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> skribis: > swedebugia <swedebu...@riseup.net> writes:
[...] >> Could we make all guile-* packages emit this suggestion? > > This limitation is the same as <https://bugs.gnu.org/22138>. It’s actually a different issue here: the profile contains packages that provide share/guile/2.2, but the same profile doesn’t contain any package that “claims” share/guile/2.2. Thus, everything is working according to plan, so to speak. I understand this particular case is confusing though. It’s confusing because Guile is already installed, albeit in another profile. What we could do to avoid this confusion is pre-define GUILE_LOAD_PATH and GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH in /etc/profile, just like we do for INFOPATH et al. WDYT? Ludo’.
