Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Clément Lassieur wrote: >> PS: I'm unsure whether it makes sense to report bug for softwares that >> are considered non-free and are just packaged in channels. If it >> doesn't, I'll happily close my bugs reports. > > We don't use our official communication channels (the mailing lists and > #guix IRC channel) to recommend non-free software. But Chromium is > widely distributed under a BSD license, so I think we should consider it > free. Guix goes beyond software freedom by following the FSDG [0], and > the Chromium varant being discussed is specifically intended to comply > with the FSDG. > > In general, we don't need to handle bug reports for packages in external > channels. In this case, we are working to bring the package into GNU > Guix, so it's appropriate to report issues here, in my opinion.
Okay! Thank you for making it clear. > [0] > https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.en.html