l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello gentlefolks! > > Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: > >> First, this sounds like it’s up to the user to pick either EFI-based >> GRUB or BIOS-based GRUB. It is not clear that this is determined by >> whether the machine has a {BIOS, EFI in legacy mode} or EFI. It’s >> really not much of a choice. >> >> Second, the “parted” command operates on the first partition (“1”), yet >> for the second command the second partition (“/dev/sda2”) is used. It’s >> better to be consistent here, i.e. to change “set 1 esp on” to “set 2 >> esp on” and to state that this would modify “/dev/sda2”. >> >> Finally, it is not clear where the efi partition should be mounted. >> Should it be /mnt/boot/efi? If so, should the configuration file >> specify “/mnt/boot/efi” as the target? Or should it be “/boot/efi”? >> >> An example would be useful here. > > It’d be nice to fix this before the release. Anyone could take a look > to address these issues?
I've tried to address the latter issue in <https://bugs.gnu.org/31959>. I tested it by installing in a virtual machine with the ESP mounted at "/mnt/boot/efi", using a Guix snapshot that included that commit. It also works on my installed system with the ESP on /boot/efi. Here is a patch addressing the second issue:
From 28b1aff2f0a78e7736c214880bbcfce1c0135346 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 11:59:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Use a consistent partitioning scheme. * doc/guix.texi (Preparing for Installation): Consistently refer to the ESP as /dev/sda1; root file system as /dev/sda2; and swap as /dev/sda3. --- doc/guix.texi | 20 ++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index da05a200a..d3375601a 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -8641,21 +8641,21 @@ create a file system on the relevant partition(s)@footnote{Currently GuixSD only supports ext4 and btrfs file systems. In particular, code that reads file system UUIDs and labels only works for these file system types.}. For the ESP, if you have one and assuming it is -@file{/dev/sda2}, run: +@file{/dev/sda1}, run: @example -mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda2 +mkfs.fat -F32 /dev/sda1 @end example Preferably, assign file systems a label so that you can easily and reliably refer to them in @code{file-system} declarations (@pxref{File Systems}). This is typically done using the @code{-L} option of @command{mkfs.ext4} and related commands. So, assuming the target root -partition lives at @file{/dev/sda1}, a file system with the label +partition lives at @file{/dev/sda2}, a file system with the label @code{my-root} can be created with: @example -mkfs.ext4 -L my-root /dev/sda1 +mkfs.ext4 -L my-root /dev/sda2 @end example @cindex encrypted disk @@ -8663,12 +8663,12 @@ If you are instead planning to encrypt the root partition, you can use the Cryptsetup/LUKS utilities to do that (see @inlinefmtifelse{html, @uref{https://linux.die.net/man/8/cryptsetup, @code{man cryptsetup}}, @code{man cryptsetup}} for more information.) Assuming you want to -store the root partition on @file{/dev/sda1}, the command sequence would +store the root partition on @file{/dev/sda2}, the command sequence would be along these lines: @example -cryptsetup luksFormat /dev/sda1 -cryptsetup open --type luks /dev/sda1 my-partition +cryptsetup luksFormat /dev/sda2 +cryptsetup open --type luks /dev/sda2 my-partition mkfs.ext4 -L my-root /dev/mapper/my-partition @end example @@ -8688,11 +8688,11 @@ by @code{guix system init} afterwards. Finally, if you plan to use one or more swap partitions (@pxref{Memory Concepts, swap space,, libc, The GNU C Library Reference Manual}), make sure to initialize them with @command{mkswap}. Assuming you have one -swap partition on @file{/dev/sda2}, you would run: +swap partition on @file{/dev/sda3}, you would run: @example -mkswap /dev/sda2 -swapon /dev/sda2 +mkswap /dev/sda3 +swapon /dev/sda3 @end example Alternatively, you may use a swap file. For example, assuming that in -- 2.18.0
I'm not sure how to best resolve the first issue. I suppose we can mention that if unsure which GRUB to use, the user can test whether "/sys/firmware/efi" exists on the live image. We could also make it clearer when booting whether the installer is in "UEFI" mode or not.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature