Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Theodoros Foradis <theodo...@foradis.org> writes: > >> My guess (not being familiar with qt), is that somehow, having the two >> inputs in different prefixes, causes the problem with the package's >> build system. I gave a look at the cmake files, but couldn't locate the >> issue/fix. > > You could try to validate your hypothesis by using a union package such > as it was done for python-pyqt+qscintilla. That package would have only > one prefix. If that really does make a difference we might be able to > investigate the issue further.
Thanks for the union package recommendation. I tried that, but unfortunately it does not fix the icon issue. I see that there is a wip-qt-paths branch in our git repo. I don't really know its purpose, maybe it's worth to try rebasing it on master and build pulseview with that? Any other ideas? -- Theodoros Foradis
