Hello Guix! It seems our LAPACK substitute is now different than what is offered upstream:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Starting download of /gnu/store/g77svvbbamdd8k4wgv9kmp8jbqfn9dvs-lapack-3.7.1.tgz From http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapack-3.7.1.tgz... lapack-3.7.1.tgz 8.7MiB 1.7MiB/s 00:05 [####################] 100.0% output path `/gnu/store/g77svvbbamdd8k4wgv9kmp8jbqfn9dvs-lapack-3.7.1.tgz' should have sha256 hash `0yavf6m9l78pwlnk5g61cg8x28mr30j0g8gkai0jrdqfjjmf3whs', instead has `1j51r7n5w4k7r3lrvy7710xrpkg40wf4rqnmngfz6ck9ypckzign' cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/i4498667sjsnl24fb32mf97la1jdp22s-lapack-3.7.1.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Investigating a bit with diff, one can find that many hidden files have been cleaned up from the release: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- diff -ur lapack-3.7.1-guix/ lapack-3.7.1-upstream/ Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/: ._lapack-3.7.1 Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1: ._appveyor.yml Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS: ._blas.pc.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS: ._CMakeLists.txt Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS: ._Makefile Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS/SRC: ._caxpy.f Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS/SRC: ._ccopy.f Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS/SRC: ._cdotc.f Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS/SRC: ._cdotu.f Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/BLAS/SRC: ._cgbmv.f [...] Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/TESTING: ._zgbal.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/TESTING: ._zgd.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/TESTING: ._zgg.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/TESTING: ._zsb.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/TESTING: ._zsg.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/TESTING: ._ztest.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1/TESTING: ._ztest_rfp.in Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1: ._TESTING Only in lapack-3.7.1-guix/lapack-3.7.1: ._.travis.ym --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The attached patch fixes the hash, and an issue was opened here [0] to let the maintainers know of the problem. I've built lapack myself with this change and all the tests still pass. Thanks, Maxim
From f69c6bbb8bee804057ccc1dc076311d3cbf5e89c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 12:01:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: lapack: Fix hash of release 3.7.1 Apparently the release was modified (cleaned-up) in-place. An issue was opened at https://github.com/Reference-LAPACK/lapack-release/issues/4. * gnu/packages/maths.scm (lapack): Fix sha256 hash. --- gnu/packages/maths.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/maths.scm b/gnu/packages/maths.scm index 1bf049fc4..f8967cd94 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/maths.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/maths.scm @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ large scale eigenvalue problems.") version ".tgz")) (sha256 (base32 - "0yavf6m9l78pwlnk5g61cg8x28mr30j0g8gkai0jrdqfjjmf3whs")))) + "1j51r7n5w4k7r3lrvy7710xrpkg40wf4rqnmngfz6ck9ypckzign")))) (build-system cmake-build-system) (home-page "http://www.netlib.org/lapack/";) (inputs `(("fortran" ,gfortran) -- 2.13.1
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
