On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:34:55PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > > What about Ricardo's "really gross fix"? [0] I don't understand it enough to > > know why it's gross. If it works and does not break other things, at > > least it could protect people who have not yet hit the bug, but will hit > > it the next time they run `guix pull`. > > It’s gross because it’s just a band aid. I don’t know if it might break > other things (in my short tests it didn’t). It shouldn’t affect people > with new daemons, because they will use the daemon’s download feature. > > I guess we could just push it to fix “guix pull” now and revert later > once we have a good fix (or if it causes trouble). > > What do you think?
Since you know my relative ignorance, take this with a grain of salt, but that sounds good to me. You should probably wait for Andy's opinion, though :)
