Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lo...@openmailbox.org> writes: > Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lo...@openmailbox.org> writes: >> >> Well, I didn't know it was decided to use GuixSD icon for Guix as well. >> I agree with Mathieu and Chris Marusich: use the same icon is fine, but >> not the same text. For example: >> >> ~v~ Guix >> ~v~ GuixSD >> >> If this is OK, then I think we should: >> >> - Add an updated Guix logo to the artwork repo. >> - Send a copy to GNU womb for update. >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/download/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/graphics/ >> - Update https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ > > These tasks are done, and changes are online now. > > The updated Guix logo in the package list should be visible once GNU > womb links to the new image > (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-womb/2016-12/msg00001.html).
Looks great! Does the guix-artwork repository contain the "horizontal" version that is currently published on the website? I couldn't find it. I've also noticed that the Wikipedia article is still using the other logo. I attempted to update it, but because I don't have an account, I wasn't able to replace the SVG file with the new one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guix I don't suppose someone on this thread can fix the Wikipedia article? If not, I'll try again once the 10-day "autoconfirm" period of restricted access for new Wikipedia accounts passes. FWIW, there also appears to be a copy of the logo in Wikimedia commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guix-logo.svg I tried to update this one, too, but the Wikimedia uploader rejected the SVG files as "corrupt". -- Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
