On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:54:28AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
>
> > Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> skribis:
> >
> >> Right now we have a lot of these that look very similar:
> >>
> >> (define-public python2-chardet
> >> (package
> >> (inherit (package-with-python2
> >> (strip-python2-variant python-chardet)))
> >> (native-inputs `(("python2-setuptools" ,python2-setuptools)))))
> >
> > Right, we discussed before adding the python2-setuptools dependency
> > automatically as part of ‘package-with-python2’. I think this would be
> > a good idea, indeed.
>
> What about this:
>
> --- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> @@ -345,6 +345,14 @@ instead of @command{python3}.")))
> (define-public python-wrapper (wrap-python3 python))
> (define-public python-minimal-wrapper (wrap-python3 python-minimal))
>
> +(define (package-with-python2+setuptools p)
> + (let ((base (package-with-python2 (strip-python2-variant p))))
> + (package
> + (inherit base)
> + (native-inputs `(("python2-setuptools" ,python2-setuptools)
> + ,@(package-native-inputs base))))))
> +
> +
> (define-public python-psutil
> (package
> (name "python-psutil")
>
> Then we need to change all the occurrences of this pattern to use this
> new procedure.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ludo’.
Would we still need the properties field in python-foo?
What would this mean for packages that need python2-setuptools and other
python2- specific packages? Specifically, would all the calls to
package-native-inputs cause a slowdown in computing the package?
--
Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
