Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...] >> Isn’t it the same issue as >> <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22558>? But that bug was >> closed. > > It's true that the first message of bug 22558 mentioned two different > failure modes of gnupg-2.1.11's test suite. However, the subsequent > discussion focused on just one of those failure modes: the one that led > to 14 test failures. I closed the bug when that failure mode was > addressed. Oh, I see. > In retrospect, since these two failure modes have different causes and > different fixes, perhaps I should have filed two separate bug reports > from the beginning. If we can agree on this, then perhaps we can > consider 22558 to address only the 14-test failure mode, and this bug > (22826) can address the gpgtar.test failure mode. > > What do you think? Makes sense, let’s keep it this way. We should probably retitle this bug accordingly. Thanks for the explanation, Ludo’.
