Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 02:35:12PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> skribis: >> >> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 06:05:29PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> >> Commit 784d6e91 changed OpenSSL such that it does not depend on Perl, >> >> but one of the subsequent upgrades broke it: >> > >> > Bisecting, I narrowed it down to: >> > 86c8f1daf8ed10f13f2b1e973a28845629b8ce47 >> > (gnu: openssl: Update to 1.0.2e [fixes CVE-2015-{3193,3194,3195}].). >> > >> > I'll get the openssl sources corresponding to the good and bad commmits >> > and try to figure out what changed that pulled perl back in. >> >> Awesome. Hopefully we can apply the fix when we upgrade OpenSSL this >> Tuesday. > > 'openssl-c-rehash.patch' is being applied, but at some point in the > build process the change is reverted.
In the source, I see: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ find -name c_rehash\* ./tools/c_rehash ./tools/c_rehash.in ./doc/apps/c_rehash.pod --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Could it be that the unpatched one ends up being installed or something? Ludo’.