On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Many other projects publish online manuals for both stable and > development versions. As our releases are a little far apart and we’re > encouraging to do “guix pull” (so users really run the development > version) I think it would indeed make sense to also publish an > up-to-date version of the manual along with the manual for the latest > release.
Or alternatively, release more often :-) I wonder whether we should not make a point release after each security update instead of encouraging people to use "guix pull" (but we would quickly arrive at 0.9.9 now, after which only 1.0.0 would be a reasonable option to keep numerical and lexicographical ordering consistent). Or a point-point release as 0.9.0.1 and so on. Andreas
