l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
>
>> Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> writes:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>>
>>>> Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From e60db83ffff23c57ec5c44de7c99cee8e4e353ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>> From: Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org>
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:34:25 -0800
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add linux-libre-4.2.5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This older version of linux-libre is being added because it was found
>>>>>> that newer versions (or at least 4.3.3) of linux-libre were not reading
>>>>>> the hardware clock on (at least Libreboot-enabled) Thinkpad x200
>>>>>> machines.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * gnu/linux.scm (linux-libre-4.2.5): New variable.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would say that the variable should be named 'linux-libre-4.2', which
>>>>> would always be bound to the latest 4.2.x. However, there's another
>>>>> problem: the 4.2 branch is no longer supported upstream, so it will no
>>>>> longer receive security updates and other important fixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest that we instead add linux-libre-4.1, which is still supported
>>>>> upstream and is designated as an LTS branch. Would that be okay?
>>>>
>>>> If it works for Christopher, that’s a good idea.
>>>
>>> Fine by me, assuming it works. I can test it works fine probably tomorrow.
>>
>> I just added a 'linux-libre-4.1' variable. Can you test to make sure it
>> works for you? I'd like to remove linux-libre-4.2.5 ASAP because 4.2.x
>> is no longer supported upstream and contains security flaws.
Chris reported on IRC that linux-libre-4.1 works for him, so I removed
linux-libre-4.2.5.
> Regardless, it seems that this bug can be closed on the Guix side; WDYT?
Agreed. I've closed the bug.
Thanks,
Mark
