Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis: >> >>> So, using HIDBP is probably wrong and might very well be the cause. >>> Looking at the module names again I searched the logs for “usbkbd” and, >>> yes, the GuixSD logs contain this line: >>> >>> usbcore: registered new interface driver usbkbd >> >> Do you think we should remove usbkbd from (gnu system linux-initrd)? >> Is there another module we should load instead? > > I don’t know why one would want to use “usbkbd” and thus HIDBP. As far > as I understand “usbhid” should be sufficient.
Looking at the description you pasted, I agree with you. I’ve removed usbkbd loading in commit b153f9f. Jessica, could you confirm one way or another that usbkbd is the culprit? Thanks, Ludo’.
