Finally got around to this. On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote: > "Claes Wallin (韋嘉誠)" <g...@clacke.user.lysator.liu.se> skribis: > >> I suppose if I have a freshly built guix with "guix package -i guix" >> or "guix package -u guix" it should be using guile 2.0.11 then? >> Actually looking at the head of .../bin/guix it's referring to a >> guile-2.0.11. > > Yes, so that should be OK. And it’s Guix > 0.8.2, right?
# /root/.guix-profile/bin/guix --version guix (GNU Guix) 0.8.3 # ls -l /root/.guix-profile/bin/guix lrwxrwxrwx 3 root 999 71 Jan 1 1970 /root/.guix-profile/bin/guix -> /gnu/store/bja9w08pay8rqfs83f3rzlms9q63kymw-guix-0.8.2.a43b55f/bin/guix >> But guix-daemon still doesn't seem to be honoring http_proxy. > > As a first test, could you check whether ‘guix download’ honors it? It does. > A second test would be: > > 1. Define ‘http_proxy’ in your user shell. > 2. From the same shell, run ‘guix build -S gcc --no-substitutes’, say. > > Does that honor ‘http_proxy’? http_proxy is set (and exported) in user shell and in the daemon process. No. > And a third test is for substitutes: Are they also downloaded via the > proxy? Here you need to: > > 1. Define ‘http_proxy’ in a root shell. > 2. Run ‘guix-daemon’ from this shell. > 3. From a user shell, run ‘guix build gcc’, say, which should normally > download a substitute from hydra.gnu.org rather than trying to build > things. > > Does the substitute download honor ‘http_proxy’? No. Whenever the daemon is doing the downloading, http_proxy is ignored and I get "Temporary failure in name resolution" because the VM doesn't have an internet DNS. As I said earlier, guix has guile-2.0.11 in the hashbang. But guix-daemon seems to be making use of guile-bootstrap. If I provoke it a bit I get this: # find /gnu/store/cyppdaliwllm1mzgka3cxwxnddk7j2cl-guile-bootstrap-2.0/ -name '*.scm' -exec touch {} + # guix package -i texinfo . . . ;;; note: source file /gnu/store/cyppdaliwllm1mzgka3cxwxnddk7j2cl-guile-bootstrap-2.0/share/guile/2.0/ice-9/eval.scm ;;; newer than compiled /gnu/store/cyppdaliwllm1mzgka3cxwxnddk7j2cl-guile-bootstrap-2.0/lib/guile/2.0/ccache/ice-9/eval.go ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ;;; or pass the --no-auto-compile argument to disable. . . . ;;; it seems /gnu/store/cyppdaliwllm1mzgka3cxwxnddk7j2cl-guile-bootstrap-2.0/share/guile/2.0/ice-9/receive.scm ;;; is part of the compiler; skipping auto-compilation ;;; WARNING: compilation of /gnu/store/cyppdaliwllm1mzgka3cxwxnddk7j2cl-guile-bootstrap-2.0/share/guile/2.0/ice-9/command-line.scm failed: ;;; ERROR: failed to create path for auto-compiled file "/gnu/store/cyppdaliwllm1mzgka3cxwxnddk7j2cl-guile-bootstrap-2.0/share/guile/2.0/ice-9/command-line.scm" starting download of `/gnu/store/2zkyyw4bq0wzsxdysncrf9lmwl44w5wh-binutils-2.25.tar.bz2' from `http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/binutils/binutils-2.25.tar.bz2'... ERROR: In procedure getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution ... so it's pretty clear that *something* in there is still referencing the bootstrap guile. But maybe that's expected? Are the guile packages built using only the bootstrap and not themselves? /gnu/store/0aq1kq37b6kr562330xz61rg08l6y5yg-guix-0.8.2.a43b55f.drv has: Derive([("out","/gnu/store/bja9w08pay8rqfs83f3rzlms9q63kymw-guix-0.8.2.a43b55f","","")] . . . ("/gnu/store/4lkrvcnh2y923la3ivsbyv2m2nv3xpjy-guile-2.0.9.tar.xz.drv",["out"]) . . . ("/gnu/store/d3x2skfxhvqj21w39f6bckmxni1q3bbp-guile-2.0.11.tar.xz.drv",["out"]) . . . ("/gnu/store/hvl3gwa57p7k1qnliyy6ymbmz2509azh-guile-2.0.11.drv",["out"]) . . . ("/gnu/store/p4i1inysxx5ra0hvhcrd9liw3a5skcbx-guile-2.0.9.tar.xz.drv",["out"]) . . . ("/gnu/store/wlivhx78f1a05dx0blqy209cb1nqwgf5-guile-2.0.9.tar.xz.drv",["out"]) . . . ["/gnu/store/iylwyjzxcy3hkz1wlgpyk4zmhci97rgk-guix-0.8.2.a43b55f-guile-builder"],"x86_64-linux","/gnu/store/cnqmkmj40jmssnx6fkf9n0n3bqj5x426-guile-2.0.11/bin/guile",["--no-auto-compile","-L","/gnu/store/x2nfxrqhdsvir8l65x19bhnrwd4h41rs-module-import","/gnu/store/iylwyjzxcy3hkz1wlgpyk4zmhci97rgk-guix-0.8.2.a43b55f-guile-builder"],[("GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH","/gnu/store/07n184fk33b7gqkyrbn6b2ckdfisp09i-module-import-compiled"),("out","/gnu/store/bja9w08pay8rqfs83f3rzlms9q63kymw-guix-0.8.2.a43b55f")]) Why so many different guile drivers? Is that expected? > Thanks in advance! No problem!