Am Donnerstag, 14. März 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis:
> > I think it would be better to change it to "glibc" (which is what both
> > of us thought naturally that it was already). I think this occurrence
> > needs to be changed: ./gnu/packages/base.scm:1091: ("libc"
> > ,glibc-final)))) in %final-inputs, and probably other places to be
> > coherent.
> Well, I’d rather keep it as is to avoid needless churn, and because the
> ‘g’ is really implicit anyway.It is not very intuitive, since all the packages are called "glibc*", and we usually use the package name as key in the hash tables. So one should be coherent in making the "g" explicit or not. In any case, this is not a big problem. Andreas
