"Jason Self" <ja...@bluehome.net> skribis: > Hmm. It might make sense to differentiate when a third party is > involved, but not when the GNU Project itself is doing it.
[...] > I guess it depends on what you define an "an official complete GNU > system release" to be. That would ultimately have to come from RMS, > of course, but if the only difference is the kernel (but both kernels > are official GNU packages) and the distro offered the option of using > both of them, the line seems perhaps a little bit more blurry in that > regard. Hmm yes, that makes sense (and indeed, the longer-term goal is to support several kernels.) That would comfort me in choosing the (gnu ...) name space. Ludo’.
