"Jason Self" <ja...@bluehome.net> skribis: > I left it out because as a series of facts (package name, version, > URL, hash, dependencies, etc.) I'm not sure that these files are even > copyrightable to begin with.
Yes, I’ve been wondering too. The thing is, while most are purely declarative like this, some, like those in base.scm, are trickier and definitely copyrightable. In base.scm, the composition of packages in the bootstrap phase may also be copyrightable in itself. Thanks, Ludo’.
