Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis: > The specification mandates a string, but with rationale suggesting symbols > would be a more natural fit. > >> In some ways using symbols would be preferable. However, we want >> human-readable names, and standard Scheme does not provide a way to include >> spaces or mixed-case text in literal symbols. > > Add support for symbols as implementation extension. > > * module/srfi/srfi-64.scm (%cmp-group-name): New procedure. > (test-end): Use it.
I added “for backwards compatibility with the reference implementation” and credited Daniel for reporting the issue. Applied, thanks! Ludo’.
