Hi Tomas, Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.courno...@gmail.com> writes: > >> This is an import of the 'Abstract', 'Rationale', and 'Specification' >> sections from the upstream specification text, with some manual >> adjustment. >> >> * doc/ref/srfi-modules.texi (SRFI 64): New subsection. > > I think important question to ask here is whether this manual section > documents SRFI-64 or what Guile ships as SRFI-64. Current > implementation shipped by Guile has many quirks that do not conform to > the specification. > >> +@c This SRFI 64 documentation was "snarfed" from upstream specification >> +@c HTML document using the 'snarfi' script. > > Based on this I believe it describes the specification. That's correct. It's been slightly modified in places where it said things like "left to the implementation" and I was able to verify what the current implementation in Guix does. > I think either of those is fine (albeit describing the Guile's flavor > would be preferred), but is should be stated (that the behavior There's not really a Guile flavor; it's more like the reference implementation flavor ;-). The one in Guile is pretty stock. > described by the manual does not match the implementation shipped). I'd consider different behavior in the implementation compared to the specification bugs. -- Thanks, Maxim
