Hi y'all,
Thanks for the (continued) reviews!
I hadn't commented on that last sentence before, but if I knew how to
have the Guile debugger reliably break where I want it to (I don't, or
somehow haven't managed to have it work well), I don't think using
'pk',
which requires editing files before and after debugging, could be
described as more convenient :-).
A fair point! I can change that wording in a next version of the patch.
I would suggest to apply the ’pk’ on the other branch, something
as:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(map (lambda (v)
(if (number? v)
(pk 'number v (number->string v))
v))
'(1 "2" "3" 4))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
I'm not sure I understand how this improves the demonstration of 'pk'.
What does this form of the example demonstrate that the version in the
patch does not? It's a minor change so I'm happy to make it; I just
want to ensure that we have the best possible version of the solution
to the problem you see.
Best,
Juli
