Hello, I've mean meaning to use 'test-error' in test suites, but as a comment in its source says, it's currently incomplete:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;; TODO: decide how to specify expected error types for Guile. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So, for example, this should fail but passes: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) (test-begin "test") (test-error "testing" 'bad (throw 'oops)) (test-end "test") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- 'test-error' report success for any type of exception, which means its 2nd argument is currently unused. It'd also be nice if as its second argument it could accept non only a error symbol key, but an exception type *or* an exception predicate, e.g.: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (ice-9 exceptions) (srfi srfi-64)) (define-exception-type &my-exception &exception ;parent make-my-exception ;constructor my-exception?) ;predicate (test-begin "test-error exception types") ;; Passes, but should fail. (test-error "&my-exception raised" &my-exception (raise-exception (make-error))) ;; OR ;; Unimplemented, but passes also. (test-error "&my-exception raised" my-exception? (raise-exception (make-error))) (test-begin "test-error exception types") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- There is a more modern implementation of SRFI-64 out there for Guile which may provide clues or be used wholesale, though I haven't tried it: <https://codeberg.org/taylan/scheme-srfis/src/branch/master/srfi/64>. -- Thanks, Maxim