Hi, Julien Lepiller <jul...@lepiller.eu> skribis:
> Le 17 juin 2020 17:57:33 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès" <l...@gnu.org> a écrit : [...] >>The regexp below is still an approximation, but I think a better one. >>Can you confirm? >> >>Thanks, >>Ludo’. > > Looks slightly better, thanks. > > That's still incorrect, as it will match things that are not ipv6 addresses. > Does it have to be a regexp though? Why not simply check (false-if-exception > (inet-pton AF_INET6 host)), as in the return value of valid-host? Using a regexp makes the code closer to the RFC since the RFC explicitly describes the grammar. It’s also the simple choice here. > There's also a ipv6-host-pat that has an incorrect regexp, but I'm not sure > what it is used for. It’s use for ‘authority-regexp’, but that one is fine: it requires square brackets around IPv6 addresses. Pushed as 1ab2105339f60dba20c8c9680e49110501f3a6a0. Thanks, Ludo’.
