OKUMURA Yuki <m...@cltn.org> wrote: > Actually it's my own bug but let me report here: (scheme base) lacks > implementation for string-for-each thus following code does not work; > > (import (scheme base)) > > (string-for-each > (lambda (e f) 'ok) > "01234" > "slas") > > Please note that we already have incompatible string-for-each for > SRFI-13 and R6RS. > (It seems current (scheme base) uses SRFI-13 one) > R7RS for-each (and map) procedures allow different length of > collection as arguments. > > Checked on 2b4e45ca1b89a942200b7b9f46060dddc44d2876
For the record, the version of R7RS 'string-for-each' that I implemented for Guile many years ago, in the 'r7rs-wip' branch of Guile's git repository (not to be confused with 'wip-r7rs'), does not have this bug: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/module/scheme/base.scm?h=r7rs-wip&id=2d76447bda2f3d61c94d80b3b78732648a0a511d#n221 I'm not sure why Andy chose not to use my work. Mark
