Zefram <zef...@fysh.org> writes: > Computing a difference between two SRFI-19 times, using time-difference, > produces sensible results if the result is positive, but often nonsense > if it's negative: > > scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-19)) > scheme@(guile-user)> (time-difference (make-time time-tai 0 1) (make-time > time-tai 1000 0)) > $1 = #<time type: time-duration nanosecond: 999999000 second: 0> > scheme@(guile-user)> (time-difference (make-time time-tai 1000 0) (make-time > time-tai 0 1)) > $2 = #<time type: time-duration nanosecond: 1000001000 second: 0> > > The above is computing the same interval both ways round. The first time > is correct, but the second is obviously not the negative of the first.
This is fixed by commit 437e1aa03659b77a8eb4b5c6d2b104c03d038564 on the stable-2.2 branch. I'm closing this bug now, but feel free to reopen if appropriate. > The correct result for the second would be > > #<time type: time-duration nanosecond: 1000 second: -1> > > or possibly, at a stretch, > > #<time type: time-duration nanosecond: -999999000 second: 0> Most of the code in the SRFI-19 reference implementation assumes that the nanoseconds and seconds fields will have matching signs (if both non-zero), so I've taken care to use that convention exclusively. Thanks, Mark