Hello, David Pirotte <da...@altosw.be> skribis:
> From d920d22efe3e77d23004122e21cec420c402f531 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: David Pirotte <da...@altosw.be> > Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:28:24 -0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Updating repl-print to use truncated-print > > * module/system/repl/common.scm (repl-print): Use (truncated-print val), > not (write val). With this update, repl-print becomes 'friendly' wrt > large (huge) lists, arrays, srfi-4 butevoectors ... Note that it’s already possible to do this: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> ,use (ice-9 pretty-print) scheme@(guile-user)> ,o print (lambda (repl obj) (truncated-print obj) (newline)) scheme@(guile-user)> (iota 500) $20 = (0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 # …) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So the question becomes: should we change the default? I have a slight preference for keeping the default as it is to avoid surprises, but no strong opinion. Andy, Mark, others, WDYT? Ludo’.
