Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes: >> If you think it's not a good idea to include http-patch in guile, maybe >> we can export define-http-verb and/or request so that it is easy for >> users to create their own custom HTTP methods. WDYT? > > I would prefer to export the 'request' procedure from (web client), > although it should probably be exported as a different name, maybe > 'http-request'. Would that work for you?
Yes, exporting 'request' alone would serve my purpose, although 'define-http-verb' would make my script much shorter. But, I'll leave it to your judgement. Should I send a new patch exporting 'request' alone? I have also submitted one more patch https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30076 related to the web client, and required for the same PowerDNS API client that I am working on. It's a very simple patch. And, it would be nice if you could review it as well. Thanks.
