-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 01:10:58AM +0000, Zefram wrote:
[...] > Where did you get the idea to use a non-linear year numbering? What's > your opinion of SRFI-19's (lack of) text on this matter? You should > consider the possibility of changing your implementation to use the > conventional astronomical year numbering in this slot. It seems that there are both conventions, "with year zero" (astronomical) and "without year zero" (the more "conventional" historical usage (aka "Common Era"), see [1]. That said, these days (and ISO 8601) go by "with year zero". Therefore I'd sympathize with your tendency. Perhaps an option or a different set of functions might satisfy both camps? Definitely it needs to be documented. Regards [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_zero - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAljNAIUACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZwUgCfen5ea8HCGVZzXCZd3ErwGi2V MwoAnA+0Au3tNQNiFKJ1mcsMDHl6iCeT =w9Dn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
