---- David Pirotte <da...@altosw.be> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > > For what it's worth this is a part of GOOPS's design AFAIU: all slot > > definitions are unique. Two slots named S declared on classes A and B > > are distinct, even if A is a superclass of B. > > Well, as I explained in the original report, the only specification we have > is CLOS: > Stklos, upon which Guile GOOPS is based, clearly state in its manual, among > the > first paragraphs, that it implements the CLOS protocol [a subset]: there is no > 'redesign' anywhere in Stlkos [it just lacks :before and :after methods > AFAICT]. > > AFAICT, there is no Guile 'official' document stating clearly, neither in the > manual, that GOOPS authors decided to redesign this part of the protocol and > why... > is there?
Way way back, goops was a separate project from guile. This TODO file has some info on where Mikael was planning on going with it: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/guile/guile-oops/TODO?revision=1.19&root=guile&view=markup -Dale
