-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:36:15PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Is there still problem? I'm fine with the patch, and I'm expecting to > > merge it ASAP. Anyway, please don't hesitate to tell me if there's still > > any problem, I'm glad to help to do it better. I really need it. > > Sorry for the delay, but I'm having second thoughts about whether this > is the right approach. Perhaps we should instead make a set of > commitments that certain basic operations like scheme evaluation, heap > allocation, and basic scheme procedures will leave 'errno' unchanged.
A shout from the peanut gallery (again ;) but this sounds scary. Of course, clobbering errno by things out of the user's control sounds scary too. Nala's interface feels to me more... right. regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlbYn2kACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbhiwCfXq45vAYA5LVcWIcIvyQ1+GKF ZdwAn2QJVVDz/OoS/NUJ7y6R+GCwdxnc =xFmg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
