to...@tuxteam.de writes: > What's yet missing (as far as I can read off the diff) is a way to > "dream up" an abbreviation when it's not in the namespaces alist.
True. Ideally, this should work even without passing a namespaces alist at all in both "xml->sxml" and "sxml->xml". The non-abbreviated namespaces should not cause "sxml->xml" to fail. Passing around a namespaces alist to both these procedures is the least invasive approach I could think of, but I still think that it *should* be made to work without explicitly declaring namespaces.
