David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > * module/srfi/srfi-1.scm (take-right, drop-right, drop-right!): The > definitions tended to be overly complicate and/or rely on pushing > material on the VM stack, detrimental to scalability for Guile 2.0 and > also worse for performance. > > The changed definitions lead to different, more accurate exceptions > being raised. They rely on length+ returning the length of dotted > lists, behavior that is not specified by the SRFI-1 definition but > available in GUILE.
I forgot to mention that, again, the commit log should not contain rationales, but merely summarize the changes made. Thanks, Mark