Hi, Marco Maggi <marco.maggi-i...@poste.it> writes: > Mark H Weaver wrote: >> While reading psyntax.scm, I noticed that the definition of 'bound-id=?' >> does not match the definition in "Syntax Abstraction in Scheme" by >> Dybvig, Hieb, and Bruggeman. >> >> The paper states "Two identifiers that are bound-identifier=? are also >> free-identifier=?". > > I think you are referring to this paragraph from the paper[1] (page 12): > > Two identifiers that are bound-identifier=? are also > free-identifier=?, but two identifiers that are free-identifier=? > may not be bound-identifier=?. An identifier introduced by a macro > transformer may refer to the same enclosing binding as an identifier > not introduced by the transformer, but an introduced binding for one > will not capture references to the other.
Yes. >> The following expression shows that this is not the case in Guile 2.0: >> >> (let* ((x 1) (s1 #'x) >> (x 2) (s2 #'x)) >> (list (bound-identifier=? s1 s2) >> (free-identifier=? s1 s2))) >> => (#t #f) > > The expander in Ikarus/Vicare also returns this value. I think that indicates a bug in Ikarus/Vicare. >> Racket reports (#f #f) for the same expression. > > Racket is different because its expander implements a variant of phase > separation; if the whole form is evaluated at phase N, the "x" in "#'x" > should be searched among the bindings at phase N-1 (if any) I don't see how that's relevant to this example. > Your code works, but when you actually try to use the > identifiers for something: > > #!r6rs > (import (rnrs)) > (define-syntax doit > (lambda (stx) > (let* ((x 1) (s1 #'x) > (x 2) (s2 #'x)) > #`(let ((#,s1 123)) > #,s2)))) > (doit) Whether #`(let ((#,s1 123)) #,s2) works is equivalent to asking whether s1 and s2 are 'bound-identifier=?', by definition. That's precisely what 'bound-identifier=?' is supposed to be used for: to determine whether a binding for one should capture the other. I don't see why you think #`(let ((#,s1 123)) #,s2) should work. Why would you use two identifiers with different binding names (s1 and s2) to construct that code? Can you construct a more realistic example? Thanks, Mark