Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > Have you tried master? I just did, and my toy example works there. Do you think that commit de41e56492666801078e73860a358e1c63cbc8c2 is the reason?
It would be nice to get this working in stable-2.0 as well, but I guess that would require working through our disagreement over the handling of macro-introduced top-level identifiers. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2011-11/msg00016.html I still strongly believe that we should follow the standard behavior, namely that each invocation of a macro must introduce fresh identifiers (even if the macro operands are identical) just as every invocation of a procedure must introduce fresh lexical variables (even if the procedure arguments are identical). Regards, Mark
