On Wed 28 Nov 2012 16:56, Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> writes: > A short module, it is not hard to fix, though given all of the above it > makes sense to simply remove it.
I think removing it is the right thing. Even with your patch it still won't work because the default "table constructor" is a vector instead of a hash table. Regardless of whether it were new or old, I would much prefer to remove this module than to document it properly, especially given the existence of alternatives like srfi-69 and rnrs hash tables as you mention. I will apply your patch (so that the compile warnings go away), add a deprecation notice, and remove the module in master. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
